Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Steve Singer
Тема Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Дата
Msg-id BLU0-SMTP918D219251CEE0845D9FCD8EEA0@phx.gbl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 11-02-08 10:07 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
>
>   * custom SPI exceptions - I'd really like this one to go in, because it
> allows writing UPSERT-kind functions in PL/Python very easily, and it's
> just a handful of lines of code
>

I will try to do a review of this one (probably tomorrow night) since 
I've reviewed many of the related patches.

>   * don't remove arguments - a bugfix, really, and a very small one
>
> So from the above, I'd say custom datatype parsers could get rejected if
> noone feels like having a discussion about it for 9.1. Table functions,
> custom SPI exceptions and tracebacks are niceties that if postponed to
> 9.2 will just mean that many features less in 9.1. The rest is bordering
> on bugfixes, and I think should go in.
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
>



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chris Browne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: RangeTypes