On 11-02-10 10:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> I was assuming those changes were sufficiently trivial that they could
> be made at commit-time, especially if Peter is committing it himself.
> Of course if he'd like a re-review, he can always post an updated
> patch, but I just thought that was overly pedantic in this particular
> case.
>
Sounds reasonable.