On 03.01.2008, at 05:48, Brian Modra wrote:
> I have a pretty "live" table: rows being inserted and updated more
> than once 1 per second, though far, far more inserts than updates.
Not that busy ;-)
> It has not been vacuumed for months.
Not good.
> Now a vacuum on that table takes hours, and I have not let it complete
> because it stays running into our daily busy time... but I've been
> told its necessary because the table is slowing down.
>
> I have begun a cron job which will do a daily analyze, and am thinking
> of a weekly vacuum...
> Please advise on the best way to keep this table maintained, even if
> it means regularly taking the service offline early on Sunday
> morning...
Two things you can consider:
1. Cluster the table with one of the indexes. This will be really
fast, but is not transaction-safe as far as I remember for 8.2.x.
2. Use autovaccum to vacuum / analyze your database all the time. That
will keep the size small and the stats up to date.
cug
--
http://www.event-s.net