Re: Gap in sequence after fail-over

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Gap in sequence after fail-over
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTimG4iKHdZ=AZYu=7-V-bTq6BLPEOA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Gap in sequence after fail-over  (Simon Luijk <simonluijk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Simon Luijk <simonluijk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have two test systems with Postgresql in Hot-standby configuration. The
> intention
> is to fail-over to the slave every so often. When ever we switch servers
> (fail-over)
> and start inserting data, the primary ids have a gap of ~30. From the
> following
> thread form 2001 it seems this maybe expected?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2001-12/msg00082.php
>
> With a Hot-standby set-up like this, that regularly switches, can I not rely
> on
> the sequence always incrementing by 1?

No, you can't.

Sequences cache their values for performance. Any crash or failover
will produce the same effect.

We might change that for switchovers but it would take some effort and
would still be the same if it crashes.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Luijk
Дата:
Сообщение: Gap in sequence after fail-over
Следующее
От: Fábio Gibon - Comex System
Дата:
Сообщение: Shared_buffer limited by SO