Re: Replication references
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication references |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTike=oP5TGjmsT0gm8nmBnJh-iYDFA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication references (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication references
(Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the Slony >>>> support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal was we keep it. >>> >>> That was the deal. FWIW, I consider our Slony support to be less than >>> useless, in that it is basically a GUI analogue to writing a long >>> Slonik script full of apparently redundant entries. >>> >>>> I would, however, suggest that we rename it to actually be "slony >>>> replication" rather than "replication". Or "Use slony" rather than >>>> "Use replication". Calling it "replication" without qualifying it >>>> causes confusion to many users (came across it with a client just >>>> today, and it's not the first time). >>>> >>>> I realize we're fairly close to release - is this doable for 1.14, or >>>> will that fsck things up for translators? >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> It isn't that hard to translate a few strings into all supported >>> languages. If a translator isn't available to translate those few >>> strings (and they'd have to not be answering any e-mail for that to be >>> the case, and it will take them less than 5 minutes), that's likely to >>> be in a language that isn't so widely spoken - it certainly won't be >>> French or German. I'd be willing to live with a poor machine >>> translation for a little while for those languages. If someone >>> complains, the complaint is likely to be all we need to fix the >>> problem ourselves. >>> >> >> So, something like this. I went with calling the field inthe dialogs >> "Use Slony" rather than "Use Slony replication", simply because the >> second option is very long - much much longer than anything else >> there, leading to a lot of wasted space. >> >> Comments? > > It should be "Slony Replication" for the menu and the collection > factory name, not "Slony replication". Otherwise it seems OK. Agreed. Actually I thought I had fixed that already :D > I would like to hear from Guillaume before breaking the translations though. Yeah, I was planning to wait for his comment before committing anything. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: