On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On balance, I think I prefer the
>> current arrangement, though if we could make the CommitFests a bit
>> shorter I would certainly like that better. I don't know how to make
>> that happen without more reviewers, though.
>
> Given our current method (where we allow authors to update their patches
> during a CF) I don't see that we need or should try for shorter CFs. If
> we actually just reviewed patches onces it'd be a very different
> situation.
>
> So, +1 from me for keeping it as-is. I do wonder if this is coming up
> now just because we're getting closer to a release and people are,
> unsuprisingly, wishing they had been able to get their fav. patch in
> before the deadline. :)
+1 from me for keeping it as-is as well.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services