Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTi=YBA8=9PVWWmpZ4Gj9CwOJpRTi0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> If we can find a good way to do it, I think having BF animals
> automatically picking up new branches is a very good thing to have. So
> don't give up so easily :D If adding a more or less random file to
> back branches is the only way to do it, I'm for doing that - I'd just
> like to find some method that feels cleaner. But maybe I'm just
> bikeshedding for no real use here.

Adding new branches automatically would be great, but it'll need some
work from the animal herders as well as some careful design - for
example, my Windows animals have separate schedules for each branch
(some running more frequently than others), whilst my Solaris ones now
use a runner script that cycles through the list of branches on each
of a couple of animals.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained