On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah. I was wondering if anyone was gung-ho enough about this to
>> implement some kind of library that both programs could draw on.
>>
>> It probably wouldn't be super-hard, if we could agree on a rough design.
>
> It seems to me that the Mo Betta answer would be to implement the
> fabled "stored procedure" language, that has, as its distinctive, the
> capability to control transactions. That would have the capability of
> being used in places other than just inside psql.
>
> And it would be a good way for scripting things like specialized
> vacuum and analyze regimens, which cannot be done inside stored
> functions today.
Well, I'm all good with that, too, but am not fired up about either
one to implement it myself. So I think it's going to come down to
what the person doing the work feels most strongly about.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company