On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Committed with some additional hacking. In particular, I believe that
>> your version made SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT_LOCAL equivalent to
>> SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT_OFF, which was wrong; and your replacement of
>> synchronous_replication by synchronous_commit in the docs was a bit
>> too formulaic; in particular, the section on setting up a basic sync
>> rep configuration said that all you needed to do was set
>> synchronous_commit=on, which clearly made no sense, since that was
>> neither necessary (since that's the default) nor sufficient (since you
>> have to set synchronous_standby_names).
>
> Err, woops. Actually, I'm wrong about the first point: your coding
> worked, but I had to adjust it when I reordered the enum. I think the
> new ordering is more logical
Yes. Thanks a lot!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center