On Dec 16, 2010, at 8:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I would think that we want to establish the same policy as we have for
> dictionary files: they're assumed to be UTF-8. I don't believe there
> should be an encoding option at all. If we didn't need one for
> dictionary files, there is *surely* no reason why we have to have one
> for extension SQL files.
+1 KISS.
David