Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6
От | MauMau |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B58ABFD97DFE4671BCCC760DBC39793E@maumau обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6 (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6
Re: AXLE Plans for 9.5 and 9.6 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> > Some of areas of R&D are definitely on the roadmap, others are more > flexible. Some of this is in progress, other stuff is not even at the > design stage - yet, just a few paragraphs along the lines of "we will > look at these topics". If we have room, its possible we may > accommodate other topics; this is not carte blanche, but the reason > for posting here is so people know we will take input, following the > normal community process. Detailed in-person discussions at PGCon are > expected and the Wiki pages will be updated for each aspect. > > BI-related Indexing > * MinMax indexes > * Bitmap indexes > > Large Systems > * Freeze avoidance > * Storage management issues for very large systems > > Storage Efficiency > * Compression > * Column Orientation > > Optimisation > * Bulk loading speed improvements > * Bulk FK evaluation > * Executor tuning for very large queries > > Query tuning > * Approximate queries, sampling > * Materialized Views Great! I'm looking forward to seeing PostgreSQL evolve as an analytics database for data warehousing. Is there any reason why in-memory database and MPP is not included? Are you planning to include the above features in 9.5 and 9.6? Are you recommending other developers not implement these features to avoid duplication of work with AXLE? Regards MauMau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: