On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> But what it *produces* is a string. For comparison, the
> SQL-standard-specified array_agg produces arrays, but what it
> acts on isn't an array.
Meh. This is all just bike-shedding. I'm fine with string_agg(), though in truth none of the names has really been
great.The inclusion of "agg" in the name is unfortunate.
I'll have a look at Pavel's new patch now.
David