"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> Meh. This is all just bike-shedding. I'm fine with string_agg(), though in truth none of the names has really been
great.The inclusion of "agg" in the name is unfortunate.
Yeah, I wouldn't be for it either if it weren't for the precedent of
array_agg. I was quite surprised that the SQL committee chose that
name, because they've avoided using the term "aggregate function" at
all, but there it is ...
regards, tom lane