RE: boolean isn't boolean?
| От | Marc Britten |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: boolean isn't boolean? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ABFF67479EC9D111AFA30060B01AACDA03ADF6A7@mail обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | boolean isn't boolean? (Marc Britten <mbritten@cybernet-usa.com>) |
| Ответы |
RE: boolean isn't boolean?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
normaly i wouldn't be this picky but......
language-lawyer version.. you used the wrong version of the lang, the docs
say it complies to SQL3, which has completely different wording than SQL99
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 11:17 AM
To: Marc Britten
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] boolean isn't boolean?
Marc Britten writes:
> why does a boolean value return a t or an f?
The language-lawyer version:
ISO/IEC 9075-5:1999 ("SQL99") 17.2 GR6
"If [the result of the query expression] is not empty, then [it] is
returned. The method of returning [it] is implementation-defined."
Then that's how this implementation defines it. :-)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: