Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?

From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>
> Yeah, this is part of a more general problem, which you have
> characterized correctly: What is fatal (or error, or warning, ...) to
> the client isn't necessarily fatal (or error, or warning, ...) to the
> server or DBA.

Thanks.  In addition, #5 and #6 in my previous mail are even unnecessary for 
both the client and the DBA, aren't they?


> Fixing this would need a larger enhancement of the
> logging infrastructure.  It's been discussed before, but it's a bit of 
> work.

How about the easy fix I proposed?  The current logging infrastructure seems 
enough to solve the original problem with small effort without complicating 
the code.  If you don't like "log_min_messages = PANIC", SetConfigOption() 
can be used instead.  I think we'd better take a step to eliminate the 
facing problem, as well as consider a much richer infrastracture in the long 
run.  I'm also interested in the latter, and want to discuss it after 
solving the problem in front of me.

Regards
MauMau