On 24 January 2011 13:45, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> On 24 January 2011 03:52, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>>>> There are quite a few sentences which I'm not sure how to correct as I
>>>> don't know how they're supposed to read. But I've put together a
>>>> patch to correct some of the typos and grammar. There's a lot I
>>>> haven't yet gone through though.
>>>
>>> Thanks. I just committed a bunch of cleanup, including whatever of
>>> your patch I didn't rewrite along the way. If you want to take
>>> another crack at it now I'd be most grateful...
>>
>> Okay, an additional patch is attached.
>
> Committed with a bit of further hacking. Probably still needs more
> work - in particular, I think there are probably some bits in here
> that should use <caution> or <example>, and there's still some awkward
> phrasing.
I noticed I introduced a couple of grammatical errors of my own, which
you've fortunately fixed.
Yes, it still needs work, and I could see certain paragraphs needed
rephrasing, but I wasn't confident enough about what they were trying
to say to do so.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935