Re: Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server crash

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server crash
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinT3Tx3nNb4YME6j58Edp45Q9pgCyVRkZYTnXU1@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server crash  (Balkrishna Sharma <b_ki@hotmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server crash  (Balkrishna Sharma <b_ki@hotmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
The design of SSD is such that it cannot run without caching.  It has
to cache to arrange things to be written out due to issues with the
fact that it cannot write small blocks one at a time but needs to
write large chunks together at once.

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Balkrishna Sharma <b_ki@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What if we don't rely on the cache of SSD, i.e. have write-through setting
> and not write-back. Is the performance gain then not significant to justify
> SSD ?
>
>> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:35:54 -0600
>> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server
>> crash
>> From: scott.marlowe@gmail.com
>> To: b_ki@hotmail.com
>> CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
>>
>> SSD and battery backed cache kind of do the same thing, in that they
>> reduce random access times close to 0. However, most SSDs are still
>> not considered reliable due to their internal caching systems. hard
>> drives and bbu RAID are proven solutions, SSD is still not really
>> there just yet in terms of being proven reliable.
>>
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Balkrishna Sharma <b_ki@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Good suggestion. Thanks.
>> > What's your take on SSD ? I read somewhere that moving the WAL to SSD
>> > helps
>> > as well.
>> >
>> >> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 11:36:31 -0600
>> >> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server
>> >> crash
>> >> From: scott.marlowe@gmail.com
>> >> To: b_ki@hotmail.com
>> >> CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Balkrishna Sharma <b_ki@hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I need to support several hundreds of concurrent update/inserts from
>> >> > an
>> >> > online form with pretty low latency (maybe couple of milliseconds at
>> >> > max).
>> >> > Think of a save to database at every 'tab-out' in an online form.
>> >>
>> >> You can get nearly the same performance by using a RAID controller
>> >> with battery backed cache without the same danger of losing
>> >> transactions.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
>> >> To make changes to your subscription:
>> >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with
>> > Hotmail. Get busy.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> When fascism comes to America, it will be intolerance sold as diversity.
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
>
> ________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> Get started.



--
When fascism comes to America, it will be intolerance sold as diversity.

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Balkrishna Sharma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server crash
Следующее
От: Balkrishna Sharma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Asynchronous commit | Transaction loss at server crash