Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTinNiwP_hpltx25EnD_fW__idDiRZ6I1jKvpJlQU@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
>> On Jun 3, 2010, at 19:00 , Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Maybe we should just get rid of the hint.
>
>> FYI, Robert Haas suggested the same in the thread that lead to this patch being applied. The arguments against doing
thatis that a real crash during recovery *is* something to be quite alarmed about. 
>
> After some discussion among core we're going to leave it as-is.  Anybody
> who doesn't want to initdb for beta2 can test out pg_upgrade ;-)

Shouldn't we have bumped the catversion? The installers can't tell
that beta1 clusters won't work with beta2 :-(


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PITR Recovery Question
Следующее
От: Jan Wieck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages