On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hmm, it seems this is my night to rediscover the wisdom of your
>> previous proposals. I think that state would only be appropriate when
>> we shutdown after reaching consistency, not any shutdown during
>> recovery. Do you agree?
>
> No. When shutdown happens before reaching consistency, the database might
> be inconsistent, but which doesn't mean that some data might be corrupted.
> We can get consistent (not corrupted) database by applying the WAL records
> to inconsistent one.
>
>> HINT: If this has occurred more than once some data might be
>> corrupted and you might need to choose an earlier recovery target.
>
> I think that the hint message indicates the data corruption which prevents
> recovery from completing, rather than the inconsistency of the database.
Hmm, OK, I think that makes sense. Would you care to propose a patch?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company