On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> I may be in the minority here, but I'm inclined to just apply this and
>>> move on.
>>
>> FWIW, I agree with applying the code patch as-is, but I think we need to
>> consider the documentation. Specifically:
>>
>> 1. The first para of
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/isn.html
>> asserts that ISNs are "correctly hyphenated" on output. Given this
>> discussion, that statement clearly ought to be toned down. But how
>> shall we word it instead?
>
> Numbers are validated on input according to a hard-coded list of
> prefixes; this list of prefixes is also used to hyphenate numbers on
> output. Since new prefixes are assigned from time to time, the list
> of prefixes may be out of date. It is hoped that a future version of
> this module will obtained the prefix list from one or more tables that
> can be easily updated by users as needed; however, at present, the
> list can only be updated by modifying the source code and recompiling.
> Alternatively, prefix validation and hyphenation support may be
> dropped from a future version of this module.
I have committed the patch and the text proposed above.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company