On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 22:09, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Kevin and I both suggested a "fast plus timeout then immediate" behavior is
> what many users seem to want. My comments were at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01145.php ; for an
> example of how fast shutdown can fail see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-03/msg00062.php
True, I've hit that a few times too.
Seems that a better solution would be implementing a new -m option
that does this transparently?
Regards,
Marti