Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Kevin and I both suggested a "fast plus timeout then immediate"
>> behavior is what many users seem to want.
> Seems that a better solution would be implementing a new -m option
> that does this transparently?
Maybe. Another option might be to use -t or some new switch (or -t
in combination with some new switch) as a time limit before
escalating to the next shutdown mode.
-Kevin