Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Wultsch
Тема Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTin96FJbBv3kjGwjPKU-K1yAP2AHasAqrLokPqMv@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
>> It must be a setting, not a version.
>>
>> For instance suppose you have a session table for your website and a
>> users table.
>>
>> - Having ACID on the users table is of course a must ;
>> - for the sessions table you can drop the "D"
>
> You're trying to solve a different use-case than the one I am.
>
> Your use-case will be solved by global temporary tables.  I suggest that
> you give Robert Haas some help & feedback on that.
>
> My use case is people using PostgreSQL as a cache, or relying entirely
> on replication for durability.
>
> --
>                                  -- Josh Berkus
>                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
>                                     http://www.pgexperts.com
>


Is he? Wouldn't a global temporary table have content that is not
visible between db connections? A db session many not be the same as a
user session.

--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch@gmail.com

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Следующее
От: Matthew Wakeling
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL+Os on a single disk