On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 00:25, Peter Geoghegan
<peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems I omitted to copy my system's FlexLexer.h to
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/include/pgscript. Seemingly the FlexLexer.h that
> ships with pgadmin is for Flex 2.5.33 only. I have 2.5.35.
>
> However, I now get a slightly different set of compiler errors, so I'm
> not much better off.
>
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack_top’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:945:27: error: ‘yyensure_buffer_stack’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:1858:8: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
>
> ...and so on...
>
> Why do we ship a copy of FlexLexer.h from a specific version of
> flex++? Are we really that sensitive to the differences in Flex
> versions? Is the easiest thing to get pgadmin to build after changing
> the pgscript grammar to use flex 2.5.33, as perhaps suggested in
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/pgscript/README?
Isn't that part of the "ship the bison/flex output files" thing? We
ship lex.pgs.cc parser.tab.cc as well, and that's where the dependency
comes from. So we need to ship either both of them or none of them, I
think.
I don't recall exactly why it was, but the README is pretty specific
about the fact that it *is* sensitive. So the version used to generate
the .cc files should be the same as the one used for the .h....
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/