Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
| От | Richard Broersma |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTin4K86j2-GOUfmdXQ8UKv_j9V8ZRiRBEbbXj+jc@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote: > In PG the first statement you fire off (like an "insert into" for example) > will start a transaction. If you dont commit before you disconnect that > transaction will be rolled back. Even worse, if your program does not > commit, but keeps the connection to the db open, the transaction will stay > open too. Huh - is this new? I always thought that every statement was wrapped in its own transaction unless you explicitly start your own. So you shouldn't need to commit before closing a connection if you never opened a transaction to begin with. -- Regards, Richard Broersma Jr.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: