Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows

От: Kenneth Marshall
Тема: Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 20101207201028.GE4028@aart.is.rice.edu
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Richard Broersma)
Ответы: Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Kevin Grittner", )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andres Freund, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Craig James, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
  Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Richard Broersma, )
   Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Kenneth Marshall, )
    Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
     Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Craig James, )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Gary Doades, )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Kevin Grittner", )
      Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Pierre C", )
       Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Craig James, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Scott Marlowe, )
          Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Gael Le Mignot, )
           Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Scott Marlowe, )
           Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  ("Pierre C", )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Richard Broersma, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Justin Pitts, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Rob Wultsch, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Robert Haas, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
         Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak, )
          Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Robert Haas, )
        Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson, )
  Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Gary Doades, )
 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Mladen Gogala, )

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:56:51AM -0800, Richard Broersma wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Andy Colson <> wrote:
>
> > In PG the first statement you fire off (like an "insert into" for example)
> > will start a transaction. ?If you dont commit before you disconnect that
> > transaction will be rolled back. ?Even worse, if your program does not
> > commit, but keeps the connection to the db open, the transaction will stay
> > open too.
>
> Huh - is this new?  I always thought that every statement was wrapped
> in its own transaction unless you explicitly start your own.  So you
> shouldn't need to commit before closing a connection if you never
> opened a transaction to begin with.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Richard Broersma Jr.
>

The default of autocommit unless explicitly starting a transaction with
BEGIN is the normal behavior that I have seen as well.

Cheers,
Ken


В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

От: Ivan Voras
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance under contention
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance under contention