2010/5/27 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>:
> On 27/05/10 09:50, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> 2010/5/27 Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>:
>>>
>>> AFAIU, the standard doesn't say anything about named parameters. Oracle
>>> uses
>>> =>, but as you said, that's ambiguous with the => operator.
>>>
>>> +1 for FOR.
>>
>> I don't see any advantage of "FOR".
>
> Any advantage over AS? It doesn't clash with the "foo AS bar" syntax that
> the standard is using for something completely different, as Peter pointed
> out in the original post.
No, standard knows "AS" in different context. In param list standard
doesn't use keyword "AS".
>
>> We can change ir to support new standard or don't change it.
>
> What new standard?
>
ANSI SQL 2011
Pavel
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>