Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jochem van Dieten
Тема Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTin2RQQChU_CLbGjzx-pTCN-N-e=JnUOpkox=5Kw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL  (Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> Postgres is more stable than Sqlite for "enterprise-level" activity,
> hardened/enterprise
> browser distributions would choose Postgres over Sqlite for Web SQL
> implementations.

I find that very unlikely. Web SQL is to be an upgrade from cookies as
the client storage mechanism, it is not meant to be store a few TB in
GIS data. Implementors will choose based on much more practical
concerns such as portability (SQLite is not just available for Android
and iOS, it is included), filesystem layout (put the databases in one
folder for each domain just like Flash lays out its offline storage),
embeddability (5 processes just to start a DB), recovery speed (when a
mobile browser gets pushed from RAM and later fear back in, it has to
replay a 16 MB WAL file) and even just convenience (how many browsers
already use SQLite for bookmark storage?) will weight far heavier then
some perceived enterprise readiness,

Jochem

--
Jochem van Dieten
http://jochem.vandieten.net/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Charles Pritchard
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: W3C Specs: Web SQL
Следующее
От: Aidan Van Dyk
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal