Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTimxvREe+SyBg_ya-E8KhAB7R9FbhR2Gh=XqYR7A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Ответы Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I still think you might be over-designing this.  Upgrading from the
>> pre-extension world doesn't need to be elegant; it just has to work.
>
> Allow me to disagree here.  The main use case is not supporting users
> that upgrade with extensions to 9.1, but to allow people working on
> their own applications to some day realise they could as well package
> their PL code into a set of extensions.

Sure, but we're talking about adding core code to accomplish two things:

1. Avoid the need for packagers to ship one empty file.

2. Possibly, allow the operation to be completed in one command instead of two.

This is not exactly cutting anyone off at the kneecaps.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Erik Rijkers"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Range Types: << >> -|- ops vs empty range
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add support for logging the current role