On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
> I'm happy with deprecating the first two => in favour of hstore() if
> that is in line with general opinion. The hstore => text[] slice could
> be replaced by another operator name; the existing name comes from the
> analogy that (hstore -> text[]) returns the list of values, whereas
> (hstore => text[]) returns both the keys and values.
So, I kind of like Florian Pflug's suggestion upthread of replacing
hstore => text by hstore & text[]. I think that's about as mnemonic
as we're likely to get, and it gels nicely with the hstore ?& text[]
operator, which tests whether all of the named keys are present in the
hstore.
Does anyone want to bikeshed further before I go do that?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company