Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTimXKQqWC7pldR3nlft_Rr_vk58P_DmfAA_Zdj1q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> <kibo>
>> "The <search condition> shall simply contain a <boolean value
>> expression> that is retrospectively deterministic."
>
>> This is then defined in a rather complex manner that ends up disallowing
>> col > now() but allowing col < now().
>> </kibo>
>
> Oh, cute.  Seems to have been added in SQL:2003.  I guess somebody
> nagged them about wanting to be able to write CHECK(col <= now()).
> The detailed definition is amazingly laborious and yet limited, though,
> as it basically doesn't address the problem except for that specific
> case and close relatives.

Well, solving the problem in general is equivalent to the halting problem, so...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database