On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it's going
>> to be practical to retain all the migration code for every pair of
>> versions forever,
>
> I thought the idea was just to support migration from version N to version
> N+1.
I think that would be "good enough". But right now we can do better.
No reason to rip it out, is there?
...Robert