Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTim24yx_ss1zBM7z3s2Z_WwNg458+LORNHLnihPx@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm setting this as ready for committer.
>
> Thank you very much

I took a look at this tonight and am a bit mystified by the following bit:

+                       /*
+                        * PL doesn't calculate first row of function's body
+                        * when first row is empty. So checks first row, and
+                        * correct lineno when it is necessary.
+                        */

Is that true of any PL, or just some particular PL?  Is the behavior
described here a bug that we should fix, or is it, for some reason,
considered correct?  Is it documented in our documentation?

The implementation of first_row_is_empty() looks pretty kludgey, too.
It seems to me that it will fail completely if the text of the
function definition happens to contain $function$.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION boom() RETURNS text LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$
BEGIN SELECT '$function$'; END $$;

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem