On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 9/22/10 6:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > I think you missed the point of my response, which is that there are
>> > easily 106 more-pressing things to work on than the size of timetz.
>> > Do you know of any actual use cases for it?
>>
>> It would be a good project to add to the list of "easy TODOs to get
>> started with."
>
> Except for the pg_upgrade issue.
Which is a big "except".
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company