Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 9/22/10 6:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think you missed the point of my response, which is that there are
> > easily 106 more-pressing things to work on than the size of timetz.
> > Do you know of any actual use cases for it?
>
> It would be a good project to add to the list of "easy TODOs to get
> started with."
Except for the pg_upgrade issue.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +