2011/1/13 Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>:
> On 13 Jan 2011, at 19:25, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>>> The above does work, thanks. There is however one drawback: the type
>>> associated with _page.users is now an array. Is there a way to make
>>> it a 'SETOF user_t'?
>>>
>>
>> no. PostgreSQL doesn't supports SET. Only arrays are supported.
>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, Postgres certainly _does_ support set-returning functions. Maybe you were referring
tosomething in the particular context of the problem the OP is trying to solve?
>
The name of feature "SET RETURNED FUNC" doesn't mean so PostgreSQL
supports SET type in ANSI SQL sense.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> It would be kind of bad if people Google for this topic and would come back with the wrong conclusion.
>
> Alban Hertroys
>
> --
> Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling.
>
>
> !DSPAM:1030,4d2f4de011871371264419!
>
>
>