On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>>> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>>> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
>>> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
>>> >>
>>> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes,
>>> >> so those have been included in this new patch.
>>> >
>>> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails....
>>>
>>> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm
>>> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in
>>> future?
>>
>> As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly
>> News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check,
>> so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all patches at least
>> CC'd, or better still, only posted, to -hackers.
>
> I cross-posted as it's a docs change, but I want to invite the
> critical eye of those who dev'd it. Okay, so doc patches should go
> exclusively to the -hackers list? Last time I recall some disparity
> surrounding what I should be doing.
I'm not sure we have any unanimity on what the "right" thing to do
here is, and I guess I don't *really* care, except that I mildly
dislike cross-posting as a general principle.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company