On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix
>> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info.
>> >>
>> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes,
>> >> so those have been included in this new patch.
>> >
>> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails....
>>
>> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm
>> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in
>> future?
>
> As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly
> News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check,
> so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all patches at least
> CC'd, or better still, only posted, to -hackers.
I cross-posted as it's a docs change, but I want to invite the
critical eye of those who dev'd it. Okay, so doc patches should go
exclusively to the -hackers list? Last time I recall some disparity
surrounding what I should be doing.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935