Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От marcin mank
Тема Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikOrY05Y5m6Zf0gOebAWeTqzozDYKbkB6Uf6CZw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> IIRC, in old discussions of this problem we first considered allowing
> clients to pull down an explicit representation of their snapshot (which
> actually is an existing feature now, txid_current_snapshot()) and then
> upload that again to become the active snapshot in another connection.

Could a hot standby use such a snapshot representation? I.e. same
snapshot on the master and the standby?

Greetings
Marcin Mańk


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: serializable read only deferrable
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4