Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CFD505C.9010708@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump (marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.12.2010 21:48, marcin mank wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> IIRC, in old discussions of this problem we first considered allowing >> clients to pull down an explicit representation of their snapshot (which >> actually is an existing feature now, txid_current_snapshot()) and then >> upload that again to become the active snapshot in another connection. > > Could a hot standby use such a snapshot representation? I.e. same > snapshot on the master and the standby? Hmm, I suppose it could. That's an interesting idea, you could run parallel pg_dump or something else against master and/or multiple hot standby servers, all working on the same snapshot. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: