Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikJh7XGZD+SE=pwfnPJxkZT=0RSY9rUDUzd5gge@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build  (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build  (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
And hopefully Magnus will be able to help here too!

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems I omitted to copy my system's FlexLexer.h to
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/include/pgscript. Seemingly the FlexLexer.h that
> ships with pgadmin is for Flex 2.5.33 only. I have 2.5.35.
>
> However, I now get a slightly different set of compiler errors, so I'm
> not much better off.
>
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack_top’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:945:27: error: ‘yyensure_buffer_stack’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:1858:8: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
>
> ...and so on...
>
> Why do we ship a copy of FlexLexer.h from a specific version of
> flex++? Are we really that sensitive to the differences in Flex
> versions? Is the easiest thing to get pgadmin to build after changing
> the pgscript grammar to use flex 2.5.33, as perhaps suggested in
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/pgscript/README?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Geoghegan
>



--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build