Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikBQXZMQT4LjW9ikW=uWkvz_XPqpU-Ec2sYWHM1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers! (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!
(Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Kevin Grittner wrote: >> >> I don't think I want to try to handle two in a row, and I think your style >> is better suited >> than mine to the final CF for a release, but I might be able to take on >> the 2010-11 CF if people want that > > Ha, you just put yourself right back on the hook with that comment, and > Robert does seem like the right guy for CF-4 @ 2011-01. Leaving the > question of what's going to happen with CF-2 next month. My reputation precedes me, apparently. Although I appreciate everyone so far being willing to avoid mentioning exactly what that reputation might be. :-) > I think the crucial thing with the 2010-09 CF is that we have to get serious > progress made sorting out all the sync rep ideas before/during that one. > The review Yeb did and subsequent discussion was really helpful, but the > scope on that needs to actually get nailed down to *something* concrete if > it's going to get built early enough in the 9.1 release to be properly > reviewed and tested for more than one round. Parts of the design and scope > still feel like they're expanding to me, and I think having someone heavily > involved in the next CF who is willing to push on nailing down that > particular area is pretty important. Will volunteer myself if I can stay on > schedule to make it past the major time commitment sink I've had so far this > year by then. Sitting on Sync Rep is a job and a half by itself, without adding all the other CF work on top of it. Maybe we should try to find two vi^Holunteers: a CommitFest Manager (CFM) and a Major Feature Babysitter (MBS). At any rate, we should definitely NOT wait another month to start thinking about Sync Rep again. I haven't actually looked at any of the Sync Rep code AT ALL but IIRC Heikki expressed the view that the biggest thing standing in the way of a halfway decent Sync Rep implementation was a number of polling loops that needed to be replaced with something that wouldn't introduce up-to-100ms delays. And so far we haven't seen a patch for that. Somebody write one. And then let's get it reviewed and committed RSN.It may seem like we're early in the release cycle yet,but for a feature of this magnitude we are not. We committed way too much big stuff at the very end of the last release cycle; Hot Standby was still being cleaned up in May after commit in November. We'll be lucky to commit sync rep that early. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: