Is regular vacuuming with autovacuum needed?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Koczan
Тема Is regular vacuuming with autovacuum needed?
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTik63hP0v1wpstYJptr_ixiHaMjCF3tNpK+5XOZW@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Is regular vacuuming with autovacuum needed?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Re: Is regular vacuuming with autovacuum needed?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-admin
Hi all,

I have an database server that is experiencing some lock contention
and deadlock. It's infrequent, maybe once every two months, but
time-consuming to deal with.

The issue was that a routine VACUUM process (vacuumdb -az, called
nightly via cron) was locking a table and wasn't completing. This
server is also running autovacuum. This wasn't the source of the
deadlock, but I'm wondering if regular vacuuming is necessary or even
desirable with autovacuum running. Is there any reason for me to not
disable the vacuum cron job and just tweak autovacuum parameters (or
even just to leave the defaults)?

Details:
PostgreSQL version 8.4.4
Default vacuum/autovacuum parameters in postgresql.conf:
#vacuum_cost_delay = 0ms
#vacuum_cost_page_hit = 1
#vacuum_cost_page_miss = 10
#vacuum_cost_page_dirty = 20
#vacuum_cost_limit = 200
...
#autovacuum = on
#log_autovacuum_min_duration = -1
#autovacuum_max_workers = 3
#autovacuum_naptime = 1min
#autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50
#autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 50
#autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2
#autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.1
#autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 200000000
#autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms
#autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1
...
#vacuum_freeze_min_age = 50000000
#vacuum_freeze_table_age = 150000000

Cheers,
Peter

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: trigger AFTER INSERT
Следующее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is regular vacuuming with autovacuum needed?