On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>>> I always assumed "PL/pgSQL" was correct, but does anyone know for
>>> sure? Anyone interested in making consistent all these mentions of
>>> PL/pgSQL in the source (I can send in a patch if needed)?
>>
>> Sure, it should be PL/pgSQL.
>
> OK, here's a patch to fix. I tested with "make check" as
> src/test/regress/expected/plpgsql.out and
> src/test/regress/sql/plpgsql.sql are touched.
Committed, except for the changes to the .po files, which I'm given to
understand would just get overwritten by the next translation update
anyway. Not back-patching, so as to avoid creating unnecessary work
for translators.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company