Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=cD__22DuhnqY9u9m52uyqtrdw__kYP11d0pUm@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:15, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 13:18, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Adding a #define to our headers that you can test for seems like the way to go.
>
>> That's kind of what I was going for ;)
>
> I don't see the point.  You're going to need a *run time* test on
> PQserverVersion to figure out what the server will return, no?

I need *both*.


> Also, if you really do need to figure out which PG headers you're
> compiling against, looking at catversion.h is the accepted way to do it.
> There's no need for yet another symbol.

This file is, AFAIK, not included with client installs? It's
definitely not present in the libpq-dev package on debian. It's a
backend development file, no?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: small table left outer join big table