On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:45 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a
>> >>> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C
>> >>> || D).
>> >> Good point.
>
> Asking for quorum_commit = 3 would cover that requirement.
>
> Not exactly as requested, but in a way that is both simpler to express
> and requires no changes to configuration after failover. ISTM better to
> have a single parameter than 5 separate configuration files, with
> behaviour that the community would not easily be able to validate.
That's just not the same thing.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company