On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S <nixmisc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
>>>> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS
>>>> specific.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just checked. The version checker function checks for the version number
>>> and
>>> also for a bool which is set to true in EDBAS mode. So yeah, this will not
>>> be repro in pure Postgresql mode operations. Sorry for indicating so. But
>>> the issue defo comes if you try to browse a PG database in EDBAS mode.
>>
>> Why would you browse a PG database in EDBAS mode? Isn't there a whole
>> lot of other things that would break in that case as well?
>>
>> Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean with "EDBAS mode"?
>>
>
> He means when edbas is running in PG mode instead of Oracle mode.
Ah, that makes more sense.
And pgadmin incorrectly identifies that as an oracle-mode ebas server?
In that case, isn't the actual problem that it's identified as edbas
and not pg?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/