Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTi=AfTAwMv=WXdZeLzY0NNBZ1sJHDsDK+wmRMcVS@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Hey, I didn't know about those.  That sounds like it might be worth
>> investigating, though I confess I lack a 48-core machine on which to
>> measure the alleged benefit.
>
> I've got a couple 24-core systems, if it'd be sufficiently useful to
> test with..

It's good to be you.

I don't suppose you could try to replicate the lseek() contention?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance