On Fri, 23 May 2003 13:15:07 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
>[good reasons for having SERIALIZABLE subtransactions in READ
> COMMITTED main transactions]
All I'm saying is if we can have (1) a simple version with some restrictions for 7.4 and SERIALIZABLE
subtransactionsfor 7.5 or (2) nothing for 7.4 and everything for 7.5
I'd rather have (1); as long as we don't cause incompatibilities, of
course.
>We already have START TRANSACTION [...]
Great. I was so used to BEGIN that I didn't even think of trying \h.:-/
ServusManfred