Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Дата
Msg-id 9dba95df-982e-da50-c8f3-7601fbfbda29@iki.fi
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 17/06/2021 08:45, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Another problem with directly scanning the directory is, how we
> are supposed to get the "relpersistence" which is stored in pg_class
> tuple right?

You only need relpersistence if you want to use the buffer cache, right? 
I think that's a good argument for not using it.

- Heikki

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory